Legal Opinion

Callender v. Reflexite Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 7, 2012No. AC 32832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SHELDON, J.

This case involves a dispute between an employer, the defendant1 Reflexite Corporation, and its employee, the plaintiff, Robin K. Callender, as to whether General Statutes § 31-294c invariably requires an employer, to preserve its right to contest an employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the merits, either to file a form 43, notice to contest the claim (notice to contest), or to commence payment on the claim within twenty-eight days of the filing of the notice of claim. Here, the plaintiff claims2 that the workers’ compensation review board (board) erred in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dubrosky v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Lamar v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Quinones v. R.W. Thompson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API