Callender v. Reflexite Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHELDON, J.
This case involves a dispute between an employer, the defendant1 Reflexite Corporation, and its employee, the plaintiff, Robin K. Callender, as to whether General Statutes § 31-294c invariably requires an employer, to preserve its right to contest an employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the merits, either to file a form 43, notice to contest the claim (notice to contest), or to commence payment on the claim within twenty-eight days of the filing of the notice of claim. Here, the plaintiff claims2 that the workers’ compensation review board (board) erred in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dubrosky v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Lamar v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Quinones v. R.W. Thompson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019