Legal Opinion
Dubrosky v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 27, 2013No. AC 35030PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether an employer is deemed conclusively precluded from contesting the extent of a disability under General Statutes § 31-294c (b) 1 when it *264was impossible to commence payment of compensation within the statutory time period. The defendant employer, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation,2 appeals from the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Review Board (board) affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commissioner for the Fourth District (commissioner) granting the motion to preclude pursuant to § 31-294c…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Soares v. Max Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Woodbury-Correa v. Reflexite Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Dominguez v. New York Sports ClubConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Brocuglio v. Thompsonville Fire District 2Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Quinones v. R.W. Thompson Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.