Legal Opinion
Lamar v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 30, 2012No. AC 33838PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, Thomas Lamar, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) denying his motion to preclude the defendant employer, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation,1 from contesting the payment of benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-276 et seq. We affirm the decision of the board.
The following facts, as found by the commissioner, and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On December 4, 2007,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Pereira v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Town of Greenwich v. Connecticut Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Shortell v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dubrosky v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Wiblyi v. McDonald's Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Housing Authority v. CyrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.