Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 28, 2005No. 01-457CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

Plaintiff, an inventor who applied for a patent,1 filed a complaint under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, against the United States on August 7, 2001, alleging that Congress’ practice of using money generated from patent application fees paid to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for purposes other than supporting USPTO operations (1) violated the Intellectual Property Clause of the Constitution, (2) worked an unlawful taking, and (3) constituted an illegal direct tax. Plaintiff sought to certify a class of similarly situated plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Michels v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Meyers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API