Legal Opinion

Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 27, 2009No. 06-741 TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), and, alternatively, its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, filed pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6), related to plaintiff’s claims asserted under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution (“Constitution”).1 In this ac*520tion, plaintiff Strategic Housing Finance Corporation of Travis County, an issuer of…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Strategic Housing Finance Corp. of Travis County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. United States v. BondDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API