Legal Opinion
Greene v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 17, 2015No. 14-123TPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; 31 U.S.C. § 3720A; Motion to Compel; Motion to Stay; Illegal Exaction; Offset; Notice; Criminal Fine; Debt; Past Due; Certification
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In addition, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, moves to stay proceedings and to compel discovery. Plaintiff argues that when defendant offset his federal income tax overpayment for the 1995 tax year against a criminal fine owed to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Hale v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- La Spina v. U.S. Attorney's OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Ojo v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024