Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 11, 2006No. 2005-5144PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for a refund of patent fees alleged to have been unlawfully exacted. *1026The appellant, Miguel Figueroa (“Figueroa”), contends that the statutory patent fees imposed on him in 2001 and 2002 for filing his patent application and issuing his patent violated art. I, § 8, cl. 8 of the United States Constitution (the “Patent Clause”), because the statute was designed to generate revenue to fund federal programs other than the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Figueroa also contends that the fees constituted an impermissible direct tax in violation of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. United States Customs & Border ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  4. In RE:TAM en BancCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API