Legal Opinion
Ng v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 13, 2010No. AC 30884PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, Amy S. Ng, appeals following the denial of her motions to set aside the verdict and for additur. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) denying her motion to set aside the verdict as to noneconomic damages because it was inconsistent with the economic damages and (2) denying her motion for additur. Because the plaintiff has not provided us with transcripts of the trial proceeding, we cannot determine that the court abused its discretion in denying her motions. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Forrestt v. KochConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Nashid v. AndrawisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. VilleneuveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Harrigan v. Fidelity National Title Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- MSO, LLC v. DeSIMONEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Crelan v. CrelanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bligh v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.