Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Villeneuve
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 22, 2011No. AC 31841PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The defendant, Mark Villeneuve, appeals from the judgment of the trial court suspending his license to practice law. On appeal, he claims that, inter alia, (1) the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) the court improperly suspended his license prior to ruling upon his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and (3) the court and the statewide grievance committee (grievance committee) violated his due process rights because (a) the grievance complaint was not executed under “penalties of false statement,” thus…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BotwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Griswold v. CamputaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- MSO, LLC v. DeSIMONEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- MSO, LLC v. DeSIMONEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Smigelski v. DuboisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014