Legal Opinion

Skrzypiec v. Noonan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 23, 1993No. 14724PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

This appeal arises out of a dispute over the release of confidential information regarding psychiatric treatment. The plaintiff, Robert W. Skrzypiec,1 brought an action alleging negligence and a violation of General Statutes §§ 52-146d and 52-146e2 against *4the defendants, J. P. Augustine Noonan, a psychiatrist, and Richard L. R. Engelhardt, a social worker,3 to recover damages resulting from the disclosure of confidential psychiatric information to the plaintiff’s employer. The case was tried before a jury and was bifurcated to try the issues of duty and breach separately from the issues of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API