Legal Opinion

Monti v. Wenkert

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 27, 2008No. SC 18028; SC 18029PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The defendant Mark J. Decker, individually and doing business as Ellington Family Practice, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, against him for damages and prejudgment interest in favor of the plaintiffs, Audrey Monti and Robert Monti, coadministrators of the estate of their seventeen year old daughter, the decedent, Lisa Monti (Lisa), for negligent treatment of Lisa’s respiratory illness. In his consolidated appeals to this court, 1 the defendant contends that the trial court improperly denied his motion to set aside the verdict on the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Taylor v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API