Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Swift & Company

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1956No. Civ. 1101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARLICK, District Judge.

This is a typical patent infringement case, laid in the Charlotte Division of the Western District of North Carolina, under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) “Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.” The complaint alleges that plaintiff now owns through a valid assignment and has sole control as such over letters patent No. 2,247,359, duly issued under the patent laws of the United States. That defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  3. Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  4. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  5. Cox v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John F. Blaski v. Honorable Julius J. Hoffman, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  2. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION. v. WR Grace & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  3. Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Mfg. Corp., Judson Mills Div.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1962
  4. Pharma-Craft Corp. v. F. W. Woodworth Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1956
  5. Early & Daniel Co. v. Wedgefield, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API