Clayton v. Swift & Company
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WARLICK, District Judge.
This is a typical patent infringement case, laid in the Charlotte Division of the Western District of North Carolina, under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) “Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business.” The complaint alleges that plaintiff now owns through a valid assignment and has sole control as such over letters patent No. 2,247,359, duly issued under the patent laws of the United States. That defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Cox v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John F. Blaski v. Honorable Julius J. Hoffman, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- MOBIL OIL CORPORATION. v. WR Grace & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Mfg. Corp., Judson Mills Div.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1962
- Pharma-Craft Corp. v. F. W. Woodworth Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1956
- Early & Daniel Co. v. Wedgefield, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.