Legal Opinion
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION. v. WR Grace & Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 4, 1971No. Civ. A. 67-H-424PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NOEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (hereafter Mobil) sued defendant, W. R. GRACE AND CO. (hereafter Grace) and defendant, PONTIAC REFINING CORP., (hereafter Pontiac) now a division of CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY (hereafter Champlin) for infringement upon its product and process patent claims.
Pontiac and Champlin have moved the Court to sever the action against them from the one brought against Grace and thereafter to stay the proceedings as to them. They predicate their request upon the dual assertion that they are only secondarily involved in the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1981
- Houk v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Hess v. GrayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- LG Electronics Inc. v. First International Computer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.