Legal Opinion
Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Mfg. Corp., Judson Mills Div.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided April 19, 1962No. Civ. A. 2729PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, Chief Judge.
On September 13, 1960, I granted the motion of the plaintiff to amend its complaint against Cotwool Manufacturing Corp., Judson Mills Division, by adding Deering Milliken Research Corp. and Whitin Machine Works as parties-defendant. On September 14, 1960, evidently before counsel for the defendants Milliken Research Corp. and Whitin Machine Works received a copy of this Order, which was filed on September 15, 1960, wrote me and enclosed a Memorandum on the case of Moseley et al. v. United States Appliance Corporation, which was emphasized by Mr. Conrad in his argument…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- International Nickel Co., Inc. v. Martin J. Barry, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Telephonics Corporation and Fabrionics Corporation v. Lindly & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
- Wyndham Associates v. BintliffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- MOBIL OIL CORPORATION. v. WR Grace & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- State ex rel. Starner v. DehoffOhio Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.