Legal Opinion

Early & Daniel Co. v. Wedgefield, Inc.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 15, 1958No. Civ. A. C-152-G-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover $18,968.59 of the defendant for merchandise sold and delivered. The defendant admits owing said amount, less $384.33, the price of 140 fifty-pound bags of laying mash sold by plaintiff to defendant on March 29, 1957. Defendant claims that this laying mash contained an anticoccidial agent called nicarbazin” which was highly destructive to the layability of its flock of 16,-500 chickens, rather than an ingredient known as “wormal”, a poultry medication for laying chickens, as had been specified by the defendant. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Jiffy Lubricator Co. v. Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  5. Nocona Leather Goods Co. v. A. G. Spalding & Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glickenhaus v. Lytton Financial CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  2. Grubs v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1960
  3. Intergraph Corp. v. Stottler, Stagg & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API