Legal Opinion

Lagos v. City and Borough of Sitka

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1991No. S-4136PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

This appeal raises the question of the validity of 4.08.040 of the Sitka General Code. This ordinance provides,

A consumer sales tax is levied on all sales made in the City and Borough of Sitka at the rate of 4% of the selling price. An additional 4% consumer sales tax is placed upon the sale of alcoholic beverages. Normally the burden of this tax rests upon the consumer.

In 1989, the City and Borough of Sitka (“Sitka”) had amended this ordinance to include the additional tax on alcoholic beverages in response to a ballot proposition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. University of Alaska v. GeistautsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Homer Electric Ass'n v. TowsleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Interior Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant & Retailers Ass'n v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API