Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After Parks Hiway’s groundwater was contaminated by fuel leaking from an adjacent service station, it sued the station’s fuel supplier, Petroleum Sales. The superior court granted summary judgment to Petroleum Sales, finding its relationship to the contamination too remote to impose statutory or common law liability. Parks Hiway now appeals the court’s dismissal of its various claims. Because we agree with the superior court’s findings, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Phillip and Genevieve Carboy have owned and operated the Gold Hill Service…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- In Re Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Mapco Express, Inc. v. FaulkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Anderson v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.