Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation benefits payable to a claimant with a 25 percent permanent partial disability in each lung, caused in part by work-related asbestos exposure, should be apportioned 1 or reduced by the amount of that disability attributable to a concurrently developing nonoccupational disease, specifically cigarette smoking related emphysema. The defendants, Reed and Greenwood Insulation Company (Reed), and AC & S, Inc. (AC & S), 2 appeal 3 from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Provencher v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Jones v. Connecticut Children's Medical Center Faculty Practice PlanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.