Legal Opinion
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 2009No. SC 17807PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
This case returns to this court for the second time, having been remanded to the trial court following our decision in Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 276 Conn. 168, 884 A.2d 981 (2005). The named defendant, the Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation (diocese), and certain individual *5clergymen,1 appeal from the judgments of the trial court, Alander, J., granting in part the motion of the interve-nors,2 four newspaper publishing companies, to vacate certain orders3 (sealing orders) limiting disclosure of information obtained in twenty-three cases…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.