Legal Opinion

Provencher v. Town of Enfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 18, 2007No. SC 17793PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The plaintiff, Frederick Provencher, appealed from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the town of Enfield (town), claiming that the court improperly had concluded that General Statutes § 22-331 (a) 1 neither expressly nor implicitly confers a private cause of action affording declaratory relief for the town’s failure to credit the plaintiff with certain years of service for purposes of the town’s pension plan. The Appellate Court agreed with the plaintiff that, although § 22-331 (a) does not provide explicitly for a private cause of action, it…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Xu v. NeubauerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  3. Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Allstate Life Insurance v. BFA Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Gerardi v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API