Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Holker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 2007No. A06-896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This attorney discipline case arose out of a petition filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility against respondent Kenneth M. Holker alleging numerous violations of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct and the Minnesota Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). After a hearing, the referee concluded that Holker had violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct as in effect before October 1, 2005: 1.3 (failing to act diligently in representing a client); 1.4 (failing to adequately communicate with the client); 1.15(a), as further…

3Cases cited19 opinions

In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against JagielaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against OverboeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
In re Disciplinary Action Against FettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.