Legal Opinion
Jill Ruzicka v. The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. And Claudia Dreifus
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1991No. 90-5243PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
Jill Ruzicka appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Conde Nast Publications, Inc. (“Conde Nast”) and Claudia Dreifus on Ruzicka’s breach of contract and other state law claims. Jurisdiction is premised on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1989). Conde Nast owns Glamour Magazine. (“Glamour”). Ruzicka agreed to be interviewed for a story in Glamour on sexual abuse. Dreifus, who wrote the story, promised Ruzicka that her name would not be used and that she would not be identifiable from the article. Ruzicka contends that the promise was broken when…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hime v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Perricone v. PerriconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Jill Ruzicka v. The Conde Nast Publications, Inc., Claudia DreifusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- International Travel Arrangers v. NWA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.