Legal Opinion
Hime v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 1979No. 48078PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company appeals from the order for summary judgment and judgment of the Hen-nepin County District Court, which set aside the family exclusion clause and ordered State Farm to indemnify its insured, George Hime, for a judgment against him for damages suffered by his wife arising from an automobile accident in Minnesota. We affirm.
On December 5,1966, appellant issued an automobile insurance policy to respondent, a Florida resident. The policy recognized that the insured automobile would be principally garaged in Florida. It also contained the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clay v. Sun Ins. Office Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Joseph H. Whitney v. The Guys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.