Vandeputte v. Soderholm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Yetka, Justice.
These actions, each brought by plaintiff as the holder of a promissory note against the maker, were consolidated for trial. All defendants alleged fraud in the inducement as a defense and counterclaimed. The District Court of Rice County ordered summary judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgments entered. We affirm.
In February 1969, the five defendants herein each executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note in the amount of $5,000 and bearing 8 percent annual interest. Each of the notes was conditioned upon, and incorporated by reference, an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Belisle v. Southdale Realty CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Stanley McDonald Norman R. Hagfors, and Clayton Jensen v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.