Legal Opinion

Hiestand v. Wolfard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, J.

Plaintiff filed this action to recover a real estate commission allegedly due under an Acreage and Farm Listing Agreement signed by the defendant Wolfard as the seller. Plaintiff also prayed for the allowance of $1,535 as a reasonable attorney’s fee to be paid by the seller under the following provision of the agreement:

“* * * In case of a suit or action on the contract I hereby agree to pay such additional sums as the court adjudge [s] reasonable as Plaintiff’s attorney fees.”

The case was tried without a jury and the court, in a letter opinion, decided for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Parmentier v. RansomOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipler v. Van RadenOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. EMC Mortgage Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. In re the Marriage of HaguewoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API