Legal Opinion
State v. Cole
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMengleb, J.
(Pro Tempore).
The defendant and two other men were indicted jointly and charged with the crime of conspiring to commit a felony. The other two co-conspirators pleaded guilty. The defendant pleaded not guilty, was tried by jury, and was convicted.
The defendant alleges that the trial court erred as follows:
1. In allowing the two co-conspirators, as state’s witnesses, to testify that they had pleaded guilty to the charge.
2. In allowing the state to question one of the co-conspirators regarding the defendant’s posting his bail.
3. In permitting the state to question the co-conspirators regarding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Albright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. JustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. StefanelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Saffold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- State v. CaudillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.