Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Haguewood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1981No. 6247, CA 17025PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J. PRO TEMPORE

The wife appeals from the decree dissolving the parties’ marriage, assigning as error the trial court’s award of spousal support in lieu of an equal division of property. She also claims the court erred in its valuation of the family business. The parties were married for 24 years. Their children are grown and emancipated. The principal marital asset is the family business, a wheat farming operation purchased during the marriage, in 1963, from the husband’s mother for $127,000. The tillable acreage was doubled in 1977 through the purchase of adjoining land for $225,000.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of LakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Carrier v. CarrierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of EngleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API