Legal Opinion

Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine Mill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1966PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for damages because of personal injuries received while in defendant’s sawmill. Plaintiff’s complaint contained two alternative theories of recovery. The first was based upon common law negligence and the second was under the Employers’ Liability Act. Upon the completion of plaintiff’s case in chief the court granted an involuntary non-suit as to plaintiff’s second theory. The case was submitted to the jury on the common law theory and the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.

Throughout the entire proceedings in this case…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McHenry v. HOWELLS ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Williams v. Portland General Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Towe v. Sacagawea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Yundt v. D & D BOWL, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API