Legal Opinion
Shipler v. Van Raden
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1980No. TC 18-253, CA 11599, SC 26471PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The issue is whether, in a suit in equity, a party seeking attorney fees under ORS 20.096(1) must adduce his evidence on attorney fees before the trial court has rendered the decision which will determine who is the prevailing party. We hold that is not necessary.
That section of the code provides:
"In any action or suit on a contract, where such contract specifically provides that attorney fees and costs incurred to enforce the provisions of the contract shall be awarded to one of the parties, the prevailing party, whether he is the party specified in the contract or not, at trial or on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Krishell Laboratories, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- PACIFIC NORTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. HollowayOregon Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Wacker Siltronic Corp. v. PakosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Arabian v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Zaik/Miller v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.