Legal Opinion
Hillman v. Town of Greenwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 26, 1991No. 14048PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiff, Howard B. Hillman, brought an action for damages and injunctive relief against the *522defendant, the town of Greenwich, alleging that unlawful and unreasonable drainage of surface storm water by the defendant had damaged the plaintiff’s property. The trial court, Hauser, J., rendered judgment, in part, for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court. We transferred the appeal to ourselves pursuant to Practice Book § 4023.
The following facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff owns two adjacent parcels of real property in the town of Greenwich, the first located…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Plasil v. TablemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.