Legal Opinion
Rana v. Ritacco
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 19, 1996No. 15214PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the plaintiffs notice to her employer, Whitta*332ker Corporation (Whittaker), of a third party action complied with General Statutes § 31-293 (a).1 We conclude that the notice fulfilled the requirements of § 31-293 (a), and that therefore Whittaker’s failure to inter*333vene timely in the action caused its right of action against the third party tortfeasor to abate.
The material facts are not disputed. On January 23, 1989, while acting in the course of her employment as director of procurements with Whittaker, the plaintiff, Barbara L. Rana,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Davis v. Forman SchoolConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Heim v. California Federal BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.