Legal Opinion
Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1992No. 14402PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether an attorney may sign and issue a citation1 in *543an administrative appeal in which he is a party plaintiff. The ten original plaintiffs,2 who are individual property owners in Bethany, filed an administrative appeal in Superior Court to challenge the action of the defendant inland wetlands commission of the town of Bethany (commission) granting the application of DJM Development Corporation (DJM) for a permit for a subdivision.3 See General Statutes § 22a-42a (c) and (d). The commission moved the trial court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ appeal on the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.