Legal Opinion
Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1987No. 12832; 12833PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
These two appeals were consolidated for argument. They raise identical questions. The appeal in Docket No. 12832 must be dismissed because it was prematurely brought. The appeal in Docket No. 12833 will be separately considered.1
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant, a corporation engaged in selling new and used automobiles. The complaint was in five counts. In the first count the plaintiff alleged that in July, 1984, the defendant sold to the plaintiff a used 1980 model Ford Bronco (the vehicle), to be used for off-the-road driving. The plaintiff paid the purchase price and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.