Legal Opinion

Gray v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and at the close of all the evidence the defendant made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit, C. S., 567. The court below overruled the motions and in this we can see no error. We think the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, sufficient to be submitted to a jury on “taking or appropriation.”

The plaintiffs owned about 200 acres of land, about 6 miles from the defendant city of High Point. The defendant, within about 10 to 15 feet of plaintiffs’ land, on the east side of the farm, erected a sewage disposal plant. The city of High…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Metz v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Donnell v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Williams v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Barker v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hobbs v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API