Legal Opinion

Cook v. Town of Mebane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The complaint of plaintiffs is two-fold: (1) That defendant diverted water from Mill Creek which flowed through their land and damaged their land and mill site; (2) that after taking the water from Mill Creek for municipal purposes that below this intake the defendant emptied its sewerage into Susan Mebane Branch, which flowed into Mill Creek and damaged -their land and mill site. Defendant both diverted and polluted the water that ran through plaintiffs’ land to their damage.

Defendant denied that there was any appreciable amount of water taken or sewage disposal that emptied into the stream…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Durham v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Winchell v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Dayton v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Gray v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. McKinney v. DeneenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API