Legal Opinion

Long v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 13, 1982No. 132A81PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The major issue brought forward for review is the permissible scope of relief sought by the petitioners for alleged injuries and damages to their persons and property. More specifically, the issue is whether plaintiffs in addition to recovering for the diminution in the value of their real property upon the theory of inverse condemnation, may recover (1) for personal injuries and property damages resulting from direct overflights upon allegations sounding in trespass and nuisance and (2) punitive damages. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm Judge Snepp’s dismissal of the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hare v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API