Hobbs v. Queen City Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The record on this appeal discloses that while there are other allegations of negligence in the amended complaint as set out in the foregoing statement of the case, the trial in the Superior Court was had upon the alleged theory that at the time of the collision the bus of the corporate defendant was being driven by the individual defendant, employee and agent of corporate defendants, at a reckless and high rate of speed and out of control, and without keeping a proper lookout for the safety of others traveling upon the highway, thereby permitting the bus to move from its right-band side to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Chaffin v. BrameSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Gibson v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.