Legal Opinion
Barker v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1943No. 4692PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
The complaint alleged that the defendant, a municipal corporation, for five years had owned and operated a sewage disposal plant within its corporate limit, near a public highway, and near the dwelling where Agapita Urioste, plaintiff’s intestate, a girl less than ten years of age, lived and had her home.
The plant is described, and it is alleged that it consists of tanks filled to a depth of about eighteen feet with a discharge from the sewers of the defendant city; that there was floating on top of the mass in said tanks a deposit of sludge and filth with the appearance of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Hoggard v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.