Legal Opinion

Sandlin v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiff alleges that she and her husband occupy a house and lot on Chestnut Street; that on the lot is an abandoned closet which has never been used by the plaintiff or by any member of her family or household; that a pipe connects the closet with the sewer in the street; that the sewer is of irregular or insufficient size, particularly at the place of its union with the pipe; that the defect in construction causes an overflow of sewage through the closet upon the lot and the consequent deposit thereon of refuse and noxious sediment; that such deposit not only causes vile and sickening…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Fisher v. New Bern.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API