Legal Opinion

Holthe v. Iskowitz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1948No. 30526PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— During the year 1947, Mrs. Bessie Uhlman, a resident of the city of Tacoma, was the owner of a 1940 Dodge four-door sedan. October 19, 1946, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company wrote a policy of insurance in Mrs. Uhlman’s favor, protecting her, inter alia, against liability for damages resulting to third parties from the operation of the automobile.

Mrs. Uhlman never drove the car, it having always been driven by her daughter, Miss Betty Uhlman (who resided with her mother as a member' of her household), a college student, twenty-two years of age, who was employed part time in Tacoma.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Boyer v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Adkins v. Inland Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cypert v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Kohly v. Royal Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API