Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
David Morgan Norris and Irvin Victor Norris are father and minor son. They are or are about to be defendants in an action to recover damages- for personal injuries and property damage sustained by Mr. and Mrs. Leo Phillipson in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident the plaintiff Irvin was driving a Plymouth automobile owned by E. A. Parkford. This action is for declaratory relief to determine the respective rights and duties of the plaintiffs and the defendant Pacific Indemnity Company, herein called Pacific, under the insurance policy issued by it to the owner Parkford. Pacific…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Hinton v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- O'Roak v. Lloyds Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Peerless Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.