Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Carmody

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1936No. 25784. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This appeal is part of the aftermath of onr decision in the case of Hinton v. Carmody, 182 Wash. 123, 45 P. (2d) 32. In that case, a judgment rendered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff against the defendants Carmody was affirmed. For a statement of the facts concerning the accident, reference is made to the opinion referred to.

After the going down of the remittitur carrying the affirmance of the judgment, the plaintiff, following the prescribed procedure, caused a writ of garnishment to be served upon Associated Indemnity Corporation, a corporation, which had issued a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. American Automobile Insurance v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fenton v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holthe v. IskowitzWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. L. J. Dowell, Inc. v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hamm v. CamerotaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Vance v. Offices of Thurston County Com'rsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API