Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De Maison
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
In Pennsylvania, is a person who is allowed to drive an automobile by one who has been given the owner’s permission to use the car for a specific purpose, an additional insured under the terms of the owner’s public liability automobile policy which extends coverage to “any person while using the automobile * * * provided the actual use of the automobile is by the named insured or with his permission?” (Emphasis supplied.)
That is the issue presented by the instant appeal — novel in the sense that the precise question has never been decided by the appellate courts of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- P. Dougherty Co. v. United States. P. Dougherty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- The E. A. Packer, ScullySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brown v. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Stanley Gerr and Carl Gerr, a Minor by Stanley Gerr, His Guardian v. Harry William Emrick and Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- General Insurance Company of America, and Interveners, Sherman L. Jones v. Western Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Baesler v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Costanzo v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Standard Accident Insurance Company v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.