Legal Opinion
Cypert v. Roberts
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 1932No. 23837. Department OnePublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
A coupe automobile belonging to Halley’s, Inc., a corporation, of Tacoma, driven by Miss Dorothy Roberts, collided with another automobile. The actions of Mitchell v. Nalley’s, Inc., 163 Wash. 183, 300 Pac. 526, Cypert v. Nalley’s, Inc., 163 Wash. 703, 300 Pac. 528, and Parker v. Nalley’s, Inc., 163 Wash. 703, 300 Pac. 529, arose out of the collision. The plaintiffs in each of those cases sued the driver and the owner of the car for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the driver. In each case, there was a verdict against both defendants upon which a judgment was entered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitchell v. Nalley's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Cypert v. Nalley's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Parker v. Nalley's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by19 opinions
- Holthe v. IskowitzWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Chatfield v. Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Blair v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Samuels v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.