Legal Opinion

Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEM

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1988No. 54851-0PublishedCited by 162 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

111 Wn.2d 452 (1988)

760 P.2d 337

TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

WASHINGTON PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS' UTILITY SYSTEM, ET AL, Respondents.

No. 54851-0.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

August 18, 1988.

Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, P.S., by David L. Martin and Steven J. Jager, for appellants.

Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, by Timothy J. Whitters and Thomas L. Palotas; Blair, Schaefer, Hutchison, Wynne, Potter & Horton, by David C. Hutchison, for respondents.

PEARSON, C.J.

Transcontinental Insurance Company and Columbia Casualty Company…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by162 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API