Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Plum

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1929No. Docket No. 1069PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction had upon an information charging grand theft. The information is in the following words and figures, omitting title:

“The District Attorney of the County of Plumas, State of California, hereby accuses C. D. Plum of a felony, to-wit, grand theft, in that on or about the 3rd day of May, 1928, in the County of Plumas, State of California, he unlawfully took the property of A. Ncwhart, consisting of fifty thousand board feet, or thereabouts, of lumber, of the value of Nine Hundred Dollars in lawful money of the United States.
“Dated, June 6, 1928.
“…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. PlumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. MortierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MarconiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People v. CorenevskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Plum v. NewhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. In Re MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API