Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Plum

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1928No. Docket No. 1009PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

-The information charges the defendants with the crime of “grand theft, committed as follows: The said Fred Plum and R. S. Christman on or about the twentyninth day of August, A. D. nineteen hundred and twentyseven, at the county of Yuba, in the state of California, then and there being, did wilfully and unlawfully take, steal and carry away the property of one J. B. Dalby, consisting of five head of cattle, of the value of two hundred twenty dollars.” Neither defendant demurred to the information and each of them entered a plea of not guilty. They were both convicted and sentenced to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Commonwealth v. FarmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Matter of City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. BerrymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API