Legal Opinion
Plum v. Newhart
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. 4398PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for a change of the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 397 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff commenced this suit in Sacramento County, for damages for malicious prosecution. The defendants filed their answer together with an application for a change of venue to Plumas County for the convenience of witnesses. This proceeding was in due form. The plaintiff opposed this motion for a change of venue, and at the same time filed a counter-motion to retain the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wrin v. OhlandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Mason v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gray v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Wood v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Stewart v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Finnell v. FinnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Plum v. Forgay Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.