Legal Opinion

People v. Cain

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1907No. Crim. No. 68PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny upon an information wherein it was charged that he did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously take, steal, lead and drive away a certain young cow, to wit, a heifer then and there of the age of about two and one-half years, and then and there the personal property of one T. D. Cheney. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order of the court denying his motion for a new trial, and in support thereof presents his bill of exceptions.

The subject of the larceny charged was a cow which belonged to defendant. When it was about one year…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. DickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. PhotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Arques v. National Superior Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. In Re JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API