Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1886No. 11187PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff had a verdict for six. thousand five hundred dollars, upon which judgment was entered.

The appeal is by defendant from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff and defendant are brothers. Mary Jones, their mother, was an incompetent person, and one Levi Nicewonger was guardian of her estate, and as such guardian had procured an order of court authorizing him to sell certain of the personal property belonging to his ward, and had advertised it for sale.

The plaintiff and one Calvin Jones, another brother *90(or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grant v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Potter v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Levy v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Hahn v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richter v. NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Griswold v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hurgren v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Smith v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API